Drake v. Alonso
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, J.
In this appeal, respondent in a proceeding under the Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA), ORS 107.700 to 107.735, challenges a restraining order prohibiting his contact with petitioner. Respondent assigns error to the trial court’s issuance of the FAPA restraining order. In support of his position, respondent first contends that the record does not support the trial court’s finding that abuse occurred. See ORS 107.718(1). Second, respondent asserts that the court erred by failing to make two findings that were essential to the issuance of a FAPA restraining order, specifically, that petitioner…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- MEEKS v. GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Hyland Const., Inc. v. Williamsen & Bleid, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Scott v. KesselringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Emon Enters., LLC v. KilcupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019