Legal Opinion
Pentax Corp. v. Myhra
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 27, 1994No. 92-064-GFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HATFIELD, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Pentax Corporation (“Pentax”), instituted the present action seeking pre-enforcement judicial review of an administrative decision by the U.S. Customs service (“Customs”). This matter is presently before this court on plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction; defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint; and defendants’ motion to dissolve injunction or, alternatively, clarify injunction and provide for security.
BACKGROUND
Pentax is a major importer and distributor of photographic and optical equipment. From 1987 through…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Trayco, Incorporated v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Biehl & Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1982
- Carlingswitch v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pentax Corp. v. MyhraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Pentax Corp. v. RobisonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Pentax Corp. v. MyhraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Pentax Corporation v. MyhraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.