Legal Opinion

Lee v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 29, 2002No. SLIP.OP. 02-33; 97-12-02192PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge.

Plaintiff Byung Wu Lee (“Mr.Lee”) initiated this action pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(2)(B) to contest the decision of the Secretary of the Treasury (“Secretary”) revoking his customhouse broker’s license. Mr. Lee has moved for judgment on the agency record under U.S. CIT Rule 56.1 to set aside the Secretary’s decision. For the reasons that follow, Mr. Lee’s motion is denied, and the Secretary’s decision is affirmed.

I. Background

The United States Customs Service (“Customs”), a bureau of the Department of the Treasury, issued a broker’s license to Mr. Lee on August 12,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2006
  2. United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010
  3. Byung Wu Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API