Legal Opinion
Pentax Corporation v. Myhra
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 26, 1995No. 94-35277Published
1Opinion of the Court
72 F.3d 708
PENTAX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Donald W. MYHRA, in his official capacity as District
Director of Customs for the District of Great
Falls, MT; U.S. Customs Service, an
agency of the U.S.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-35277.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 2, 1995.
Decided July 31, 1995.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing
Dec. 26, 1995.
Charles H. Bayar, Bayar Law Office, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
E. Roy Hawkens, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe, Intervenor-Appellant v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Trayco, Incorporated v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Sessler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Pentax Corp. v. MyhraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.