Legal Opinion

State v. Atkinson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1996No. 21719PublishedCited by 449 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Stanton E. Atkinson pleaded guilty to misdemeanor driving under the influence of alcohol, (DUI), I.C. § 18-8004. His plea was conditional, reserving the right to appeal from the magistrate’s prior denial of Atkinson’s motion to suppress evidence. The district court affirmed the magistrate’s decision on the suppression motion. We, like the district court, conclude that the magistrate’s decision was correct.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

According to the magistrate’s findings, based upon testimony at the hearing on Atkinson’s suppression motion, the following facts gave rise to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. EmoryIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. NaccaratoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by449 opinions

  1. State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. FlowersIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. RoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. FleenorIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. GibsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005

444 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API