Legal Opinion
Wercinski v. International Business MacHines Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 9, 1997No. Civil Action H-95-3387PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
GILMORE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Instrument #39). Having reviewed the submissions of the parties and the applicable law, this Court has determined that Defendant’s motion should.be GRANTED.
I. Background
This action was brought on behalf of the United States by Relators Robert Wereinski (“Wereinski”) and Emil Kuropata (“Kuropa-ta”) pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733. (“False Claims Act”). Both Wereinski and Kuropata are employed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) as auditors. In 1990, the DCAA…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Little v. Shell Exploration & Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States Ex Rel. Reagon v. East Texas Medical Center Regional Healthcare SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- United States Ex Rel. Smart v. Christus HealthDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Dekort v. Integrated Coast Guard SystemsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- United States ex rel. King v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.