Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. King v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided January 4, 2005No. Civ.A.4:01CV469-YPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the defendants’ Consolidated Motion To Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, filed April 12, 2004. Having carefully considered the motion, response, and reply, the Court concludes that the motion should be GRANTED.
On June 6, 2001, Paul King filed his original complaint, alleging that each defendant had: (1) violated the False Claims Act *570(“FCA”);1 (2) conspired to violate the FCA; and (3) were unjustly enriched by their actions. After investigating King’s allegations, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Willard v. Humana Health Plan of Texas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States Ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. James M. Thompson v. Columbia/hca Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Williams v. WMX Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States of America, Exrel., Insoon Lee v. Smithkline Beecham, Inc. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- US Ex Rel. Bennett v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- United States Ex Rel. Foster v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2008
- United States Ex. Rel. Lam v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
- United States Ex. Rel. Lam v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
- United States ex rel. Vavra v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.