Little v. Shell Exploration & Production Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge:
This case presents an issue of first impression for our court. Is a federal employee, even one whose job it is to investigate fraud, a “person” under the False Claims Act such that he may maintain a qui tam action? We disagree with the district court and conclude that there is no basis to except such an employee from personhood. A second question is whether the Act’s “public disclosure bar” is an impediment to this suit. The district court determined that this bar applied but used an overly broad conception of the bar. We REVERSE and REMAND for further…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Reynaldo Ramirez v. Jim Wells County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States ex rel. Wuestenhoefer v. JeffersonDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2015
- United States Ex Rel. Colquitt v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Hancock County Board of Supervisors v. RuhrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States ex rel. Hendrickson v. Bank of Am., N.A.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.