Legal Opinion

St. John v. Schulze

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 25, 1931No. 2596PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This is an appeal by St. John and Gray from concurring decisions, of the Patent Office tribunals, awarding priority of invention to ap-pellee Schulze.

The invention in issue is a process for producing useful mineral oil distillates, particularly lubricating oils, by distilling certain oil materials under very high vacuum, that is to say, at a very low absolute pressure and under nonoxidizing, conditions. The three counts in issue follow:

1. The process of producing useful mineral oil distillates which comprises-distilling, under an absolute pressure not exceeding 25 millimeters mercury, mineral…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. BrandesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
  3. Kyrides v. BrusonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  4. Larson v. EicherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Euth v. OliverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API