Legal Opinion
WW Extended Care, Inc. v. Swinkunas
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 2002No. 02A03-0109-CV-302PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
WW Extended Care, Inc., (Extended Care) appeals the trial court's denial of its motion to correct errors and raises several issues which we consolidate and restate as: 1) whether Judge Levine lacked jurisdiction to rule on Extended Care's verified motion for proceedings supplemental; and 2) whether the trial court properly assigned the burden of proof to Extended Care to show that the appellees-garnish-ees-defendants, John and Maria Rushinsky (the Rushinskys), breached their fiduciary duty as attorneys-in-fact to defendant Mary Swinkunas.
FACTS
Extended Care obtained a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Cavinder Elevators, Inc. v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Villanella v. GodbeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Halteman Swim Club v. DuguidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Trinity Baptist Church v. HowardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hudson v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Trinity Baptist Church v. HowardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007