Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Davis
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 2003No. 54A01-0303-CV-77PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
Edgar E. Davis, as guardian of Billy D. Crabtree, filed suit against Steven and Roxann Hudson seeking to have a land contract declared void as the result of fraud or undue influence. The Hudsons appeal the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Davis, which declared the contract void as a matter of law and ordered the contract rescinded.
We reverse and remand.
The facts considered in a light most favorable to the Hudsons follow. Crabtree was born on April 4, 1930, and his closest living relatives are first cousins with whom he does not have a close…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estate of Reasor v. Putnam CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Wedel v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Estate of Spry v. Greg & Ken, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Poznanski Ex Rel. Poznanski v. HorvathIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Heeb v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Nichols v. Estate of TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Pierson ex rel. Pierson v. Service America Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kutchinski v. StrazzanteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Compton v. First National Bank of MontereyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.