Legal Opinion

Spivey v. Godfrey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1963No. 541PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Pending the administration of an estate, it is well settled that title to personal property of an intestate vests in his administrator and not his next of kin. Merrill v. Merrill, 92 N.C. 657; Snipes v. Estates Administration, Inc., 223 N.C. 777, 28 S.E. 2d 495; Sales Co. v. Weston, 245 N.C. 621, 97 S.E. 2d 267; Rudisill v. Hoyle, 254 N.C. 33, 118 S.E. 2d 145. Therefore, it necessarily follows that the administrator, and not creditors or next of kin, is the proper party to bring an action to collect a debt due the estate or to recover specific personal property. G.S. 28-172; 21 Am. Jur.,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Merrill v. . MerrillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Wilson v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Rudisill v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Penland v. . WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Tulburt v. . HollarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Pleasant v. Motors Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Davis v. SingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API