Legal Opinion

Bayley v. Souza

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1940No. Civ. 11276PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendant Souza appeals from an order of the trial court granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial after a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant Souza. The sole question necessary to be decided on this appeal is whether the motion was granted on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. If so, the appeal is without merit.

Robert Bayley and his wife Florence Bayley brought this action, for damages sustained in an automobile accident, against Ethel Ewing, Audrey Wheeler (now Audrey Bates), and appellant Souza. A verdict was returned in favor of defendant Souza,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Griffey v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Secreto v. CarlanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Lucerne Country Club v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Lewis v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Legg v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident of OhamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Piru Citrus Assn. v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Bayley v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Deshotel v. Atchison & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API