Legal Opinion

Banghart v. Hyde

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This case was tried in justice’s court, where plaintiff recovered a judgment of $100, which was appealed to the circuit court by defendant, and was again tried.

The facts, as claimed by the plaintiff, were that in June, 1889, he purchased of defendant a threshing separator, engine, and some threshing machinery, and gave defendant his note therefor, amounting to $1,200, with interest at 7 per cent., and that he, between the time of making said note and the last Sunday in April, 1891, had paid on said note $500; that on the last Sunday in April, 1891, he owned the property aforesaid, and also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campau v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Richardson v. McGoldrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. F. A. Buck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Chicago College of Osteopathy v. LittlejohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Short v. CureMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Smith v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API