Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Scribner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1906No. Docket No. 42PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Case by Frank Aldrich and Sarah E. Aldrich • against Enoch W. Scribner for fraud and deceit. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiffs recovered a judgment of $510 in an action on the case for deceit. The case as made •by plaintiffs was in substance as follows: On March 27, 1904, plaintiffs had bought on contract' and owned an equity in a house and lot on Warren avenue, in Detroit. Frank Aldrich, one of the plaintiffs, and acting for plaintiffs, in answer to an advertisement, called, on Barnard & McCloud, agents for defendant, about trading their equity in said property. Mr. Barnard told him Mr. Scribner -wanted to trade one parcel of land in Rochester, Mich., and a piece of land he knew all about, as he had just…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stone v. CovellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Banghart v. HydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Likes v. BaerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Buttitta v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Vaupel v. MulhallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Chicago College of Osteopathy v. LittlejohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hibbets v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API