Aldrich v. Scribner
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Case by Frank Aldrich and Sarah E. Aldrich • against Enoch W. Scribner for fraud and deceit. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Plaintiffs recovered a judgment of $510 in an action on the case for deceit. The case as made •by plaintiffs was in substance as follows: On March 27, 1904, plaintiffs had bought on contract' and owned an equity in a house and lot on Warren avenue, in Detroit. Frank Aldrich, one of the plaintiffs, and acting for plaintiffs, in answer to an advertisement, called, on Barnard & McCloud, agents for defendant, about trading their equity in said property. Mr. Barnard told him Mr. Scribner -wanted to trade one parcel of land in Rochester, Mich., and a piece of land he knew all about, as he had just…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stone v. CovellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Banghart v. HydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Likes v. BaerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Buttitta v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Vaupel v. MulhallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Chicago College of Osteopathy v. LittlejohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Hibbets v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.