Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Holsapple

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1894No. 869PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Orange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Lotz, C. J. —

The appellee was the plaintiff below. In her complaint she alleges that on the-day of September, 1891, the defendant owned and operated a railroad and was a common carrier for hire, engaged in transporting passengers and freight "over and upon its said road; that on said day defendant run over and upon its said road a certain passenger train, on which it carried passengers, and upon which this plaintiff took passage from the town of Salem, in Washington county, Indiana, to Saltilloville, in Washington county, Indiana; that plaintiff paid her fare between said points, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Pygman v. HeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Anderson v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Rowe v. Gatke CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API