Legal Opinion

Chike Okafor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2017No. 14-17087PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Chike Okafor appeals the decision of the district court denying his motion for return of property. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court’s ruling.

In 2013, at San Francisco International Airport, Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) agents seized $99,500 in cash from Okafor’s carry-on bag. The DEA sent Okafor a notice on May 1, 2013, informing him that the money was subject to forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881 because it had been used in, or acquired as a result of, a violation of the Controlled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Benito Luna v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jose Troconis-Escovar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  2. (SS) Ward v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. A.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Carroll v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
  5. Claraty v. Hall-MillsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API