Chike Okafor v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Chike Okafor appeals the decision of the district court denying his motion for return of property. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court’s ruling.
In 2013, at San Francisco International Airport, Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) agents seized $99,500 in cash from Okafor’s carry-on bag. The DEA sent Okafor a notice on May 1, 2013, informing him that the money was subject to forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881 because it had been used in, or acquired as a result of, a violation of the Controlled…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Benito Luna v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jose Troconis-Escovar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- (SS) Ward v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- A.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Carroll v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- Claraty v. Hall-MillsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.