Legal Opinion
In re the Wilaka Construction Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
Motion to discharge the notice of mechanic’s lien is denied. The notice is not to be treated as one to which no verification has been attached or in which no signature appears (Matter of Passero & Sons, Inc., 237 App. Div. 638; Mozarsky v. Whinston Bros., Inc., 254 N. Y. 552; Kingston v. M. S. Const. Corp., 249 id. 533), but rather as one in which the verification is defective. In such a situation the court will not dismiss an otherwise valid lien. (Matter of Core Joint Concrete Pipe Corp. v. Paino Bros., Inc., 285 N. Y. Supp. 706; 247 App. Div. 746.) It is to be remembered that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In re James Passero & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Italian Mosaic & Marble Co. v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Mozarsky v. Whinston Bros., Inc., SchneiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Core Joint Concrete Pipe Corp. v. Paino Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fries v. BrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- In re Mengel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- C.R.A. Inc. v. J & K Plumbing & Heating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Boulder Apartments, Inc. v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Hannigan Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. AwerbuchNew York Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.