Legal Opinion

Hannigan Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Awerbuch

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Vincent G. Bradley, J.

The plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 upon the cause of action set forth in the complaint and defendant Kurtter cross-moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. This is an action to recover upon a contract for electrical work performed upon certain real property and to enforce a mechanic’s lien filed thereon in the Rensselaer County Clerk’s office. It appears all other defendants are in default and defendant Kurtter has acquired any interest they may have had in the real property in question.

There is one fact that is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Debes v. Monroe County Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. Teitler v. McDermott & McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Teitler v. McDermott & McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. In re the Wilaka Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hannigan Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. AwerbuchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API