Legal Opinion

Core Joint Concrete Pipe Corp. v. Paino Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying petitioner’s motion to amend its notice of mechanic’s Een filed pursuant to section 12 of the Lien Law, nunc pro tunc, invoking for the purpose section 12-a by correcting the name of the lienor, reversed on the law, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten doEars costs. We are of opinion that the lien was vaüd as filed and that no such amendment was necessary, except as a matter of form. There was a substantial compEanee with the statute, (Gates & Co. v. Nat. Fair & Exposition Assn., 225 N. Y. 142.) There is no claim that the notice of lien is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fries v. BrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. In re the Wilaka Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Murdock v. Property Situated at Larchmont ManorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API