Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBSON, Judge.
Our original opinion in this matter was entered on September 10, 1970 (13 Ariz. App. 31, 474 P.2d 38). In that opinion we held that the proper method of determining the liability of two insurance companies where each had an “other insurance” clause in their policies (one being an escape clause and the other an excess clause) was on a pro rata basis based upon the maximum loss each insurer would suffer in the absence of any other insurance.
Motions for rehearing have been filed in this matter which raised two basic issues:(1) The legal reasoning upon which we based our pro rata…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Transportation Insurance Company v. WadeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- General Insurance v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Mid-Century Insurance Exchange v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Traill v. FelderDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1971