Legal Opinion

Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1971No. 10291-PRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Vice Chief Justice.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. On March 12, 1968, plaintiff-appellant, Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Company (hereinafter referred to as Rocky Mountain) insured Raymond E. Hodgson, dba Ray’s Auto Body Shop, under a garage liability insurance policy with a face amount of $100,000.00 This policy provided insurance coverage under certain circumstances to garage customers using ‘loaner’ automobiles owned by Hodgson. The Rocky Mountain policy contained the following exclusionary clause:

“In consideration of the reduced rate of premium made applicable to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Dairyland Mutual Insurance Company v. AndersenArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Arceneaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Transport Indemnity Co. v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API