Legal Opinion

Mid-Century Insurance Exchange v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 16, 1981No. 80-2303PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE ROMITI

delivered the opinion of the court:

The sole issue in this case is whether a driver exclusion endorsement in an automobile liability policy is valid and enforceable where the policy is not certified. We agree with the trial court that it is and affirm.

Arthur Mackie, while driving an automobile owned by Arthur Lewis, collided with another automobile. Mackie had an automobile liability policy with plaintiff Mid-Century Insurance Exchange. That policy provided excess coverage while Mackie was driving a nonowned insured automobile. Lewis’ car was insured by defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McCann Ex Rel. Osterman v. Continental Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Mollihan v. StephanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Fleet Towing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Commerce Insurance v. KochMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SuarezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Katz v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Katz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API