State v. Cook
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*26EDMONDS, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b) (1995), that was entered after a stipulated facts trial. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of a duffel bag. We affirm.
The testimony of the investigating officers at the hearing was in conflict with the testimony of defendant in many respects. We are bound by the trial court’s findings of historical fact if there is constitutionally sufficient evidence to support them. State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75, 854 P2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BeltOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BeaOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.