Griffith v. Rundle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Thomas H. Brents, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reavis, J.
In July, 1897, defendant Bundle entered into a contract with the United States for the construction of certain buildings at the army post near Spokane. At the time the contract was executed, a bond was duly executed in accordance with the provisions of the act of Congress approved August 13, 1894 (28 Stat. at Large, 278). The law is entitled, “An act for the protection of persons furnishing materials and labor for the construction of public works.” Its provisions are substantially that any person entering into a formal contract with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States ex rel. Anniston Pipe & Foundry Co. v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Doll v. CrumeNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Kaufmann v. CooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Dewey v. State ex rel. McCullomIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- United States, ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeilding Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Caron v. AndrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Indianapolis Mortar & Fuel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Lee v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- School District No. 30 v. Alameda Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.