Legal Opinion
Kaufmann v. Cooper
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1896No. 5899PublishedCited by 47 opinions
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The petition in this action stated that on the 29th day of June, 1889, Symonds & Blake were awarded and entered into a contract with the state to furnish materials for and perform certain labor upon and about the industrial home at Milford, and executed and delivered to the state a bond for the faithful and full performance of the contract, J. W. Foster and M. J. Kaufmann signing such bond as sureties; that the bond contained the following conditions: “The condition of the above obligation is such that the above bounden Symonds & Blake have been awarded the contract to furnish all the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lyman v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Doll v. CrumeNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Sample v. HaleNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Korsmeyer Plumbing & Heating Co. v. McClayNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by47 opinions
- City of St. Louis ex rel. Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. Von PhulSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Getchell & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Peterson & SampsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- United States ex rel. Anniston Pipe & Foundry Co. v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Devers v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Williams v. MarklandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.