Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Lee v. Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1924PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

A careful and critical reexamination of this case forces us to the conclusion that our original opinion was in some respects erroneous. It is correctly suggested by counsel that such result was probably induced, in large measure, by the condition of the record. But if, by reason of this inadvertence, the petitioning defendant is liable to be unjustly deprived of its property, as it contends it is, we must correct the error.

In 1914 E. E. Martin was elected clerk of the Superior Court of Pamlico County for a term of four years. He was duly inducted into office on the first Monday in December,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffith v. RundleWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. City of Dickinson v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. New Home Sewing MacHine Co. v. SeagoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Bernhardt v. . DuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Supply Co. v. . Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Gilmore v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Mfg. Co. v. . BlaylockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Town of Jacksonville v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BlaylockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API