State v. Pieper
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.
The State of Texas, appellant, charged appellee, James Roger Pieper, with driving while intoxicated (“DWI”) and sought to enhance the charge to the felony level by alleging that appellee had been convicted of DWI twice before. Appellee filed a motion to quash the indictment on the grounds that the State’s attempt to enhance the charge to a felony amounted to an unconstitutional ex post facto application of Texas’s habitual DWI offender statute. The trial court granted appellee’s motion and quashed the indictment. We reverse and remand.
Factual and ProceduRal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Pomier v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Crocker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008
- Robert P. Sepeda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
- In the Interest of M.D.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Engelbrecht v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.