Engelbrecht v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
Darrin Henry Engelbrecht a/k/a Darrin H. Engelbrecht appeals his conviction for felony driving while intoxicated (“DWI”). On appeal, Engelbrecht contends that using his two prior DWI convictions to elevate his current case to a third-degree felony violated his constitutional rights. These constitutional rights, according to Engelbrecht, arise under the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution and the retroactive law clause of the Texas Constitution. See U.S. Const, art. I, § 10, cl. 1; Tex. Const, art. I, § 16; see also Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 49.04…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tyrone Gaynell Conelly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Crider v. Bobby LumpkinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
- Joe Antonio Luna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2021
- Michael Jeffrey Cohen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
- O.D. Van Duren, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.