Legal Opinion
Kim v. Servosnax, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1992No. A055586PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
This appeal and cross-appeal raise issues concerning the Franchise Investment Law (Corp. Code, 1 § 31000 et seq.), the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16720 et seq.) and related matters. In July 1986 plaintiff and appellant Agnes Y. Kim sued defendant and appellant Servosnax, Inc. (Servo), alleging, among others, causes of action for breach of contract, violation of the Franchise Investment Law and violation of the Cartwright Act. The trial court nonsuited Kim on her Cartwright Act claim; the two remaining causes of action went to the jury. The jury delivered a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v. PalssonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Alford v. PiernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- California State Restaurant Assn. v. WhitlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Shadoan v. World Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Gentis v. Safeguard Business Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Morrison v. Viacom, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Conservation v. TriplettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Schmidt v. Foundation HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.