Legal Opinion

Zmija v. Baron

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1982No. Docket 52877PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Riley, J.

The facts in this case are adequately set forth in Judge Walsh’s opinion. For the reasons stated in that opinion we concur in the resolution of all issues presented except the issue relating to the propriety of the trial court’s denial of defendant Sitek’s motion for a directed verdict. As to that issue we disagree with Judge Walsh and find no error in the denial of that motion. In a recent case, a panel of this Court accurately and succinctly set forth the standard for reviewing a motion for a directed verdict.

"In reviewing a motion for a directed verdict, this *530Court is required to view the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bahr v. Miller Brothers CreameryMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Miller v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Vincent v. RaglinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Bosca v. J. A. Ferguson Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. King v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Pauley v. HallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Botsford General Hospital v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Moody v. Pulte Homes, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cook v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API