Legal Opinion

People v. Atley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1974No. 11 March Term 1974, Docket No. 54,783PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The substantive issue raised by this case is whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict of guilt, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the crime of conspiracy to sell marijuana. We find the evidence insufficient to infer a conspiracy to sell marijuana from the facts established by the testimony at trial.

I —DETAILED FACTS

A. Crimes Charged

Defendant Atley and two others, Loren Eaton and Michael Conley, were stopped on 1-94 in Van Burén County on July 3, 1970, pursuant to a tip from a police informant who had accompanied the alleged coconspirators to Missouri to pick marijuana.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. FalconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. People v. LorentzenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. People v. HardimanMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. JusticeMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API