Legal Opinion

Bevan v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1937No. 26117PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Because of the interstate aspects, it is conceded that this case is controlled by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (Title 45, Sections 51 to 59, U. S. Code). Section 51 of such act accords a right of action to an employee against his employer when both are engaged in interstate commerce “for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence, in its cars, engines, appliances, machinery, track, roadbed, works, boats, wharves, or other…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Durbin v. Humphrey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hancock v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. John W. Webb v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  4. Barbour v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API