Legal Opinion
Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1951No. 32414PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
98 N.E.2d 301 (1951)
155 Ohio St. 185
DICE
v.
AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN R. CO.
No. 32414.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided March 28, 1951.
Wise, Roetzel, Maxon, Kelly & Andress, Akron, for appellant.
Gottwald, Hershey & Hatch, Akron, for appellee.
TAFT, Judge.
The question to be decided is: May a trial court ordinarily determine the issue as to whether an employee of a railroad was induced by fraud (other than fraud in the factum) or by mistake to execute a release of his claim arising under the Federal Employers' Liability Act?
In considering the validity of releases and other contracts, this court has…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Squire v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951