Armand Edward Blackmar v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
THE 1955 REDUCTION-IN-FORCE
The plaintiff, a former civilian employee of the defendant, sues first in this case for salary payments covering the period subsequent to October 31, 1955. On that date, the plaintiff was separated from the Government service by the Regional Office of the Veterans Administration at New Orleans, Louisiana, pursuant to a reduction-in-force action.
During his employment by the Veterans Administration, the plaintiff was a veteran preference eligible under the provisions of the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944, as amended (5 U.S.C. § 851 et seq. (1952)),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Alpert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Jerome J. Pine v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.