Legal Opinion
Garland v. Remington Arms Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 4, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 79-148PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Edward E. Garland, hereinafter referred to as Garland, is a skeet shooter of national and international renown. He has participated in a large number of skeet shooting competitions and has won several championships. In these shoots either a slide action pump gun or Remington’s Model 11 Browning Automatic was used. The Model 11 Automatic was objectionable to Garland and other skeet shooters because the rear of the receiver extended considerably above the stock and interfered with the sighting of the gun. In order to remedy this defect, Garland undertook to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Duff v. Sterling Pump Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Haynes Stellite Co. v. Osage Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Indiana General Corp. v. Krystinel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Eastern Electric, Inc. v. Seeburg CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Crown Machine & Tool Co. v. D & S Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1967
- Hooker Chemical Corp. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1964