Legal Opinion
Joe Bailey Emerson v. Labor Investment Corporation, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1960No. 6333_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought action for damages for breach of an option contract for the sale and purchase of appellee’s capital stock, alleging federal jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship. Ap-pellee, by answer, admitted the breach in that it refused to issue stock under the stock option, but asserted that the agreement in its inception was violative of 18 O.S.A. § 1.46 1 and further alleged both a lack of consideration and an accord and satisfaction.
The District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma found the stock option valid and in full compliance with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Assignment of the Mutual Guaranty Fire Insurance v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Housing Authority of the Kaw Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. City of Ponca City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Zelinger v. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Credit Union Liquidity Services, L.L.C. v. Green Hills Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- General Finance Corporation, Bankrupt, by Ronald W. Wright, Trustee v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- First Dakota National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.