Legal Opinion

George Eric Rosden v. A. Leuthold

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 19, 1960No. 15153PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Circuit Judge.

Leuthold sued Rosden on three unpaid hills of exchange. In addition to the $4,-700 debt, Leuthold prayed for interest from the date the notes fell due, plus reasonable attorney’s' fees and costs. Rosden denied liability and counterclaimed for $2,182.23 plus interest and costs, This amount was represented to be the unpaid balance of a $12,000 note of Leuthold’s upon which Rosden had incurred liability as an accommodation endorser, The District Court found for each party in the amount claimed on their respective causes of action, allowed interest on each from the date of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Ennis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  3. United States v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Leo Walton v. Arabian American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. Young v. GodbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Rodriguez-Bruno v. Doral MortgageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. Jacobson v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Moore v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Moses-Ecco Company, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Corporation, Roscoe-Ajax Corporation v. Charles DetwilerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API