Legal Opinion

C. W. Raymond Co. v. Kahn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1914No. Nos. 18,341—(202)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action of replevin in the district court for Scott county to recover certain macbinery. The case was tried before Morrison, J., who when plaintiff rested granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, it appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

Action in replevin to recover possession of certain brick-making machinery. At the close of plaintiff’s case the trial court granted a motion of defendant to dismiss the action, and afterwards denied a motion for a new trial. Plaintiff appealed.

The ultimate question here is whether or not the trial court was right in dismissing the action. The facts, as they appeared from the evidence and the admissions of the parties, are as follows:

On March 4, 1910, defendant ordered in writing of plaintiff a brick-making machine, dies and end cutting table, for which he agreed to pay $850 and freight from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Segrist v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Thirlby v. RainbowMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Minneapolis Harvester Works v. HallySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Alden v. Dyer & BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. CasselliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mohler v. Guest Piano Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. A. F. Chase & Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Holmes v. SchnedlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. HandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Edward Thompson Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API