Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Daniels

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff’s hand was caught in the revolving rolls of a corn husking machine, at which he was working for the defendant. The declaration charged negligence of the employer in furnishing a defective machine; and in putting the plaintiff at work in a dangerous place. The answer set up contributory negligence and assumption of risk. It was agreed that the plaintiff was a farm laborer, and that his only rights are at common.law.

The plaintiff, when hurt, was feeding corn stalks to the husker. He stood upon a small platform at the side of the *362machine, placed the stalks of corn, tips forward, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. O'Toole v. PruynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Lamson v. American Axe & Tool Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Burke v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Griffin v. Joseph Ross Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Filosi v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Danahy v. CuneoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Briggs v. John Yeon Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Phillips v. CreightonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Bernasconi v. BassiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Burwick v. McClureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API