Wilson v. Daniels
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
The plaintiff’s hand was caught in the revolving rolls of a corn husking machine, at which he was working for the defendant. The declaration charged negligence of the employer in furnishing a defective machine; and in putting the plaintiff at work in a dangerous place. The answer set up contributory negligence and assumption of risk. It was agreed that the plaintiff was a farm laborer, and that his only rights are at common.law.
The plaintiff, when hurt, was feeding corn stalks to the husker. He stood upon a small platform at the side of the *362machine, placed the stalks of corn, tips forward, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Toole v. PruynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Lamson v. American Axe & Tool Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Burke v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Griffin v. Joseph Ross Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Filosi v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Danahy v. CuneoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Briggs v. John Yeon Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Phillips v. CreightonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Bernasconi v. BassiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Burwick v. McClureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.