Legal Opinion

Miller v. Secretary of Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 23, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The plaintiffs, six registered voters of the Commonwealth, seek a declaration that St. 1997, c. 164, is not subject to the process of art. 48, The Referendum, Part IU, § 2, *83of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution.2 The action was commenced in the county court, and a single justice reserved decision and reported the case for consideration by the full court. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that art. 48 does not prohibit St. 1997, c. 164, from being the subject of a referendum.

1. Chapter 164. The referendum calls for the repeal of St. 1997, c. 164, entitled “An Act…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lafayette Place Associates v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Brooks v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Johnson-Foster Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Slama v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bates v. Director of the Office of Campaign & Political FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Daveiga v. Boston Public Health CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Foss Manufacturing Co. v. Malden Mills Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API