Legal Opinion

Forkwar v. Progressive Northern Insurance

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 14, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-cv-03482-AWPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.

Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 9, and Plaintiffs Motion to Stay, Doc. No. 12. The Court has reviewed the motion papers and concludes that no hearing is necessary. See Loe. R. 105.6 (D. Md. 2011). For the reasons discussed below, the Court will DENY Plaintiffs Motion to- Stay and GRANT Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.1

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The following undisputed facts are taken from the Complaint, motion papers and attached exhibits. This case arises from an automobile…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Titan Indemnity Co. v. Gaitan Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
  2. Daniel v. National Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  3. McComb v. National Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  4. Canal Insurance v. DupontDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
  5. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina v. D'Line Logistics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API