Legal Opinion
Titan Indemnity Co. v. Gaitan Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 17, 2017No. Case No.: PWG-15-2480PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge
In November 2016,1 issued a Memorandum Opinion in the instant declaratory-judgment action holding Plaintiff Titan Indemnity Company (“Titan”) not liable for a fatal accident-involving a truck driven by Defendant Santos Sifredo Romero Garcia under a policy the insurance company issued to. Pefendant Gaitan Enterprises, Inc. (“Gaitan”). Mem, Op.. 9-10, ECF No. 72.11 also conditionally held that Titan had no duties or obligations under an endorsement called an MCS-90 that federal law requires to be attached to trucking insurance…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oakley Baldwin v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Guaranty National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- T.H.E. Insurance v. Larsen Intermodal Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lyles v. FTL Ltd.United States District Court · 2018
- Lyles v. FTL Ltd., Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018
- OOIDA RISK RETENTION GROUP v. CHARITY CONTRACT HAULING, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Prime Insurance Co. v. WrightDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Prime Insurance Co. v. WrightDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.