Legal Opinion
Iacangelo v. Georgetown University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 4, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2005-2086PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ Motion to Strike “Supplemental Report of Melvin Van Woert, M.D.,” filed on December 6, 2010, on the ground that it does not merely supplement Dr. Van Woert’s 2007 report but that it offers new and previously undisclosed opinions from Dr. Van Woert. The motion is brought under Rules 26(a)(2) and 37(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion was granted by minute order on December 30, 2010. This Memorandum Opinion explains the reasoning underlying that Order.
Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Minebea Co. v. PapstDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Coles v. PerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Halcomb v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dormu v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Daniels v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Burns v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Jennings v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.