Minebea Co. v. Papst
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Mine-bea’s Motion for Leave to Supplement the Expert Report of Mr. Thomas Gardner. The Court has examined Minebea’s motion, Papst’s opposition, and Minebea’s reply, as well as the Supplemental Report itself. For the reasons that follow, Minebea’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. This matter is also before the Court on Papst’s strike through of the testimony of Mr. Gardner and Papst’s objections to the trial exhibits Minebea proposes to introduce through Mr. Gardner. The Court’s conclusions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Roland Markeith Johnson, United States of America v. Steven Lamont LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Abdorasool Janati Forouzandeh JanatiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Keener v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1998
- United States v. James A. BrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Coles v. PerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
3Cited by68 opinions
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2008
- Muldrow Ex Rel. Estate of Muldrow v. Re-Direct, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Wannall v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Diaz v. Con-Way Truckload, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.