Josephine Ann Sleek, in No. 14,166 v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, in No. 14,167
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
Jurisdiction in the case at bar is based on diversity of citizenship and, after a jury trial, the suit resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Josephine Ann Sleek, against the defendant, J. C. Penney Co., Inc., in the amount of $10,-000. Both parties have appealed. The plaintiff asserts that the amount of the jury’s verdict was reduced because of the errors and the improper actions of the trial judge as set out hereinafter. The latter charge constitutes a most serious accusation. Penney insists that there was not sufficient evidence to support a verdict…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Sentilles v. Inter-Caribbean Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. StoehrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Robert Shad, Molly Shad, and Samantha Shad v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a Corporation Milton Ponitz and Lee McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Russell McLaughlin Jr., in No. 96-1982. United States of America v. Mark McLaughlin in No. 96-2000Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- John H. Cromling v. The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie R.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Carl Beasley Ford, Inc. v. Burroughs CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.