John H. Cromling v. The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie R.R. Co
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
John Cromling brought this suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., against his employer, The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company (the “Railroad” or the “Pittsburgh Railroad”) to recover damages for injuries sustained in the course of his employment. The jury rendered a verdict in Cromling’s favor in the sum of $18,000. It is Cromling’s contention that the award was inadequate and that this was caused by the prejudicial actions of the trial court. This appeal is from an order of the court below denying Cromling’s motion for a new…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Burton S. Knapp v. John P. KinseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Masterson v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- John E. Smith's Sons Company v. Lattimer Foundry & MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. William Trotter, in No. 75--1709, and Vincent Nuzzo. Appeal of Vincent Nuzzo, in No. 75--1710Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Michael Budzanoski, in No. 71-2030, and John Seddon. Appeal of John Seddon, No. 71-2031Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- John Milton Phillips, Jr., Jack Cecil Cherbo and Richard Dale Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- McSparran v. HaniganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Yates v. Bair Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.