Legal Opinion

Schnabel v. Nordic Toyota, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 2, 1998No. 97-336PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amestoy, C J.

Plaintiff-employee Keith Schnabel sustained a work-related injury, recovered, and then sought reinstatement to suitable employment under Vermont’s workers’ compensation statute. When defendant-employer Nordic Toyota did not offer the first available suitable position, Schnabel sued for reinstatement under 21 V.S.A. § 643b, and alleged handicap discrimination in violation of 21 V.S.A. § 495(a). After a bench trial, the superior court found liability under § 643b and awarded damages. Nordic Toyota appeals its liability and the award of damages based on Schnabel’s alleged failure to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Highgate Associates, Ltd. v. MerryfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Hilder v. St. PeterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  3. Community Feed Store, Inc. v. Northeastern Culvert Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. Shortle v. Central Vermont Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  5. Haynes v. Golub Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pion v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. MacIejko v. Lunenburg Fire District No. 2Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Luneau v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Trombley v. Southwestern Vermont Medical CenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. In Re LillySupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API