Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Cox

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1913No. 17,068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Rehearing of case reported in 92 Neb. 354.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action on a replevin bond. Property, consisting of a threshing-machine, a traction-engine, and the appliances belonging to a threshing outfit, had been taken from the obligee under a writ of replevin. There was entered in his favor in the replevin suit a judgment for a return of the property, or for its value in the sum of $2,000 in case a return could not be had, for damages in the sum of $404.50 by reason of the wrongful taking and use of the property, and for costs in the sum of $121.60. The replevin bond bound obligors as follows: “Plaintiff shall duly prosecute his action…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Washington Ice Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Capital Lumbering Co. v. LearnedOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Eickhoff v. EikenbaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hall v. Smedley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Wallace v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wallace v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API