Legal Opinion
Mahaffey v. Detroit Newspaper Agency
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 27, 1997No. 95-CV-75724Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
O’MEARA, District Judge.
Before the court are cross motions for summary judgment, filed in April 1996. Timely responses and replies were submitted. The court heard oral argument on October 4, 1996, and took the matter under advisement. For the reasons expressed in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is denied and Defendants’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
This antitrust lawsuit was filed in November 1995; the named plaintiffs are Maryann Mahaffey, Coleman A.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.